Hi, Excerpts from Paul Berry's message of Tue Sep 28 13:42:01 -0400 2010: > Ok, I think I see where you're going with this, Mathias. If we were > implementing a fresh REST API from scratch, having fewer endpoints and > supporting more methods and response codes would probably make sense. > Unfortunately, our existing REST interface is built on the indirector, and > the indirector (as currently implemented) doesn't support HEAD requests, > POST requests, or response codes such as 410 (gone) and your proposed 499 > (requested). > > I'm also concerned that incompatibilities may arise between new servers and > old clients if we add new response codes, since I don't know how existing > Puppet agents will react to the 410 and 499 response codes. > > In the interest of a speedy implementation, and in the interest of avoiding > incompatibilities, I think we should stick with the original proposal to add > a "certificate_status" endpoint. >
Agreed. -- Mathias Gug Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
