Sorry about that--sent the e-mail to two different lists, one internal to puppet. There were a couple of responses there, and the general consensus seems to be:
1) It should not cause too many waves to disallow faces from defining command-line options with the same names as built-in puppet options. 2) We intend to get rid of (or rename) the "name" setting in puppet core; among other benefits, this will allow Face authors to continue defining a "name" option for their Faces. On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Eric Sorenson <eric.soren...@me.com> wrote: > Was this discussion off-list? I don't see any follow-ups on puppet-dev to > Chris' original post. > > > On Monday, April 16, 2012 2:15:12 PM UTC-7, Jeff McCune wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Jeff Weiss <jeff.we...@puppetlabs.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > Bump. Any further input on this? >> >> Nope, Eric, James and R.I. addressed my perspective on this. >> >> Ideally I'd like a much more easy to use way for face authors to >> define their own settings and arguments, but that's likely a separate >> issue to this one. >> >> -Jeff >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Developers" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-dev/-/O2tVBWXVhY8J. > > To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
