On 12/20/2013 03:41 PM, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote: > Assuming this patch is clean/adapted, is this something Puppet could > accept? or there is still other problems?
I can't really give a well founded comment on this. I like Jeff's approach in spirit, but as far as execution is concerned, my gut says that something more object oriented would be preferable. What I'm saying is, instead of enriching interfaces with values that need passing, an approach based on inheritance and method overrides might lead to better maintainability later on. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/52B45C27.1010002%40alumni.tu-berlin.de. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
