On 10/08/2014 01:23 PM, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
>
> service { 'my_service': require => Package['mysql']{ :provider => 'gem' } }
How about require => Package<| title == 'mysql' and provider == 'gem' |>
Not that it matters - having two Package[mysql] resources will *never*
be a thing.
If I understand Andy correctly, we might have something like
package { 'mysql-gem': package_name => mysql, provider => gem }
...which is awful I guess. Anyway, relationship targets will not be
jeopardized (that I can see).
> Types of Users: <the usual>, htaccess, htdigest, tomcat, ldap(posix),
> ldap(other), weblogic, mysql, postgres, dovecot, postfix, (pretty much
> you name it....)
>
> Personally, I don't want all of these smashed into the same high level
> interface.
Hmm, I think I agree (right now...let's see about next week ;-)
But we *do* need a subtyping system then. You wouldn't want to implement
each of those as their own independent thing, would you?
Cheers,
Felix
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/54352621.7050200%40alumni.tu-berlin.de.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
