On 3 February 2017 at 11:12, Martin Alfke <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi David, > > many thanks for sharing your ideas. > > As you already know: personally I don’t say that types and providers are > way to difficult. > It is more a matter on how to explain them. > I will dig through your document during weekend. We can have a chat on > Monday in Ghent. > > But besides this: > is your idea somehow related to the libral project? > https://github.com/puppetlabs/libral > > >
> > * It maps 1:1 to the capabilities of PCore, and is similar to the libral > interface description (see [libral#1](https://github.com/ > puppetlabs/libral/pull/2)). This ensures future interoperability between > the different parts of the ecosystem. > > libral is a neighbouring project, with its own set of distinct design goals. Staying bidirectionally compatible is a necessary requisite for this proposal here. (Which can be handled on both sides, depending on a wide variety of things). Cheers, David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/CALF7fHb9b7HknTGrhMbu5213kpMX3rHg-nwiOKr2jvcqnzTh-Q%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
