>> I noticed it because it broke the puppetview fact reporting. If delete >> this line puppetview is able to correctly report facts again. If it si >> a bug I'll make a bug report. If it is correct, then I will try and >> patch puppetview. > > Well, the format didn't get modified -- we just added an attribute. > > I'd just have it ignore that timestamp, although you can also use it > to indicate the age of the information (although I think the Facts > instance would have it as 'facts.timestamp'.) > Okay, I'll code around the quirky format of that time stamp. I would have expexted it to look like: timestamp: 2008-11-12 14:47:51.749544 -06:00 instead of :_timestamp: 2008-11-12 14:47:51.749544 -06:00, that was why I want to check if it was a bug.
Evan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
