On Nov 12, 2008, at 8:28 PM, Evan Hisey wrote:
>
>>> I noticed it because it broke the puppetview fact reporting. If
>>> delete
>>> this line puppetview is able to correctly report facts again. If
>>> it si
>>> a bug I'll make a bug report. If it is correct, then I will try and
>>> patch puppetview.
>>
>> Well, the format didn't get modified -- we just added an attribute.
>>
>> I'd just have it ignore that timestamp, although you can also use it
>> to indicate the age of the information (although I think the Facts
>> instance would have it as 'facts.timestamp'.)
>>
> Okay, I'll code around the quirky format of that time stamp. I would
> have expexted it to look like:
> timestamp: 2008-11-12 14:47:51.749544 -06:00 instead of :_timestamp:
> 2008-11-12 14:47:51.749544 -06:00, that was why I want to check if it
> was a bug.
In looking at the code again... I think that can actually be removed.
We now use an 'expiration' attribute that comes from an Envelope
module, so this looks obsolete. I'll fix it.
--
The world is round; it has no point.
-- Adrienne E. Gusoff
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
