Hi > yeah I objected because of changing the behaviour of include. But I > thought that it was implemented with a different keyword, which wouldn't > change the behaviour of include. > > Something like a "stronger" include and I thought it have been called > required. > > But maybe I'm wrong.
and rereading it with full concentration I see that it should be called reuqire. :) cheers pete --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
