On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Scott Smith <sc...@ohlol.net> wrote:
> Trevor Vaughan wrote: > >> Yes. But, in theory, this is a temporary measure. >> >> If it's not, then why are you managing that file in the first place? >> >> > I monitor puppetd errors with splunk, so this could cause someone to get > paged =( > > Good idea for those of us who don't, though :) > > (If I see a feature request for this, I'll definitely upvote it.) > It would be reasonably trivial to subclass the File type to not apply changes if /path/to/file.notouch exists I think. I'm really torn about this though. Do you really want puppet thinking a resource has been applied when it hasn't been? This complicates dependencies an awful lot.... We've been considering it as a short-term band-aid for some situations, where the notouch file only works for a given period of time. > > -scott > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<puppet-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > > > -- nigel--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
