On 12/21/2010 03:55 PM, Michael Stahnke wrote: > One of the questions I have is who do you expect to work on > documentation? If you really expect developers to do it primarily, > then having it in the code repository is fine. If you want > tech-writers, or users who might be a little more scared of working > with the code in puppet proper, having it separate may encourage more > contributions. It can be a bit daunting to a person just getting > started in open source to have to create a branch, send a patch, > rebase etc to get a typo fixed. It's not all-together easier in a > separate repository, but the speed at which things change is different > so rebases, and such may be easier or less scary. > > That being said, for me it doesn't make much of difference. Having > one more repository to work in out of the dozens I spend time doesn't > really add incremental cost.
The use of the main repository still allows for documentation bugs to be filed, no? No need for the user to clone any repo, or is the intent indeed to make the users submit per patch only? Regards, Felix -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
