2010-12-20 18:38, James Turnbull wrote:
> We're now discussing whether it is a good idea to separate our
> documentation from the Puppet Core. What we're proposing is to move all
> the content from Puppet Docs (barring MCollective - which will stay in
> the Mcollective repository) into the Puppet Core repository, probably
> under a directory called "docs".
[...]
> The advantages to this we see as:
>
> 1. It's simpler to have the code and the docs in the same place
> 2. It lowers the barrier to entry for contributors - only having to
> maintain one repository and work from one repository.
> 3. We hope it'll encourage people to update Docs more when they make
> changes if they have to only commit code to one repository.
> 4. One project/place to log documentation tickets rather than two
> separate Redmine projects.
Maybe we will then get the Puppet documentation installed along with
Puppet, like most programs do? That would be nice.
Another advantage is that the installed documentation will then be
for 2.6.17 when I install 2.6.17, for 4.7.11 when I install that,
and so on.
I'm for it!
/Bellman
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
