On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 14:39, Matthew Pounsett <m...@conundrum.com> wrote:
> On 2011/02/14, at 12:21, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>
>> I think this discussion totally deserves a feature/bug report in redmine, 
>> because both positions are reasonable. They do point to a hole where our 
>> specifation seems vague, and where we *should* have made a decision: right 
>> now we have a real chance of changing whatever the behaviour is by accident.
>>
>> Matthew, do you want to file this at https://projects.puppetlabs.com for us, 
>> along with the why behind your desire?
>
> Will do.
>
> I'm actually mostly just concerned with having the relationship between the 
> two directives clarified.  Right now the docs don't say anything about how 
> they interact.  As Felix Frank wrote, I can work around the case where 
> 'creates' ignores 'onlyif' by moving that test into my 'onlyif' directive.

Honestly, that is the thing I actually care about too.  I want to make
sure we do specify it, and document that, so that we don't mess it up.
 The only thing I like less than unspecified behaviour is changing
unspecified behaviour by accident. :)

I don't know which way the design decision will go, and suspect that
the "work around" will be the only blessed outcome with giving both
being an actual error, but we will see...

Thanks for filing that.  It makes sure we don't lose track of this stuff.
    Daniel
=--
⎋ Puppet Labs Developer – http://puppetlabs.com
✉ Daniel Pittman <dan...@puppetlabs.com>
✆ Contact me via gtalk, email, or phone: +1 (877) 575-9775
♲ Made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to