On Mar 21, 3:15 pm, Brian Gallew <[email protected]> wrote: > It has occurred to me that another way of doing this would be to use defines > > define kludge($sudo_add_rule=undef) { > node { "${name}": > class {sudoers: additional_rules => [$sudo_add_rule}} > } > } > > The beauty of this is that it gets around the traditional problem of node > inheritance: that including classes in any inherited node requires adding > extra helper classes just to enable value overrides.
Does it actually work to declare a node inside a define? I wouldn't have expected so, but if it does then that might prove useful to know. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
