On Mar 21, 2011, at 1:39 PM, jcbollinger wrote: > > On Mar 21, 3:15 pm, Brian Gallew <[email protected]> wrote: >> It has occurred to me that another way of doing this would be to use defines >> >> define kludge($sudo_add_rule=undef) { >> node { "${name}": >> class {sudoers: additional_rules => [$sudo_add_rule}} >> } >> } >> >> The beauty of this is that it gets around the traditional problem of node >> inheritance: that including classes in any inherited node requires adding >> extra helper classes just to enable value overrides. > > Does it actually work to declare a node inside a define? I wouldn't > have expected so, but if it does then that might prove useful to know.
That will teach me to jump in before testing: no, it doesn't work. There goes another bright idea. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
