On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Dan White <y...@comcast.net> wrote: > In "Pro Linux System Administration" Mr. Turnbull discusses Cobbler and > Puppet > In "Pro Puppet" he discusses Foreman and Puppet. > > Would anyone out there be willing and able to talk about the differences > between Cobbler and Foreman as they relate to Puppet and what factors I > should consider in choosing one of them ? > > Not sure if I can describe every change, but I can say that foreman was designed to work with Puppet from day one.
Feel free to review Foreman [1] and its features [2] to decide for your self. Ohad [1] - http://theforeman.org [2] - http://theforeman.org/projects/foreman/wiki/Features > I want to use Puppet with Something-Else to manage a group of servers and > desktops and other machines in a centralized, automated, configurable and > repeatable fashion. I want to be able to do operating system installations, > patches and/or updates, and maintenance activity. > > Thanks. > > “Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere > in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.” > Bill Waterson (Calvin & Hobbes) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
