On Sep 30, 1:16 pm, Aaron Grewell <aaron.grew...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd prefer that the existing behavior remain the same and that a new fact be > added for those that require it. I'd rather not have to interrogate a > hypothetical Facter config file to determine what it means by 'hostname' on > each given system.
I completely agree. John > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Ken Barber <k...@puppetlabs.com> wrote: > > So the two solutions I'm groking from this conversation are: > > > 1) New fact that maps closer to the 'hostname' command (for example) > > 2) Configuration item that changes behaviour of the hostname fact. > > > Obviously we don't support configuration specifically in facter at > > this point - but ignoring that for now - what would people prefer? > > What would create the least amount of surprise? Or is there more > > options available ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
