On Thursday, June 21, 2012 5:44:46 PM UTC-5, Nick Fagerlund wrote: > > > inevitably, everyone always wants to try this: [...] >
I don't! :-) That's what I suspected you were getting at, so thanks for clarifying. That node inheritance works like class inheritance has never bothered me in the slightest; indeed, I prefer having only one set of rules to remember. [...] I think I'm convinced now that the long-term answer is to gradually > replace node definitions with something better but just as easy to get > started with. And we're moving in that direction, especially now that we > have hiera baked in. In the meantime... awkward stage. > I look forward to that new and better thing with both anticipation and apprehension. Because, you know, newer isn't always better, especially to a stick-in-the-mud like me. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/g42OI0w4GGgJ. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
