Thanks you very much Stefan. Testing were tell me something like that
exactly. But I can't reach an autorequiring reason like you did by
debug output.
It's a shame not having had prior nevertheless you are not only
clarifying me about that but also simplify my recipe. So finally I can
rest without any fear about not have Group -> User dependencies
explicitly in it, in fact puppet is smart enough as i was suspecting .
I appreciate all help, this time particularly to Stefan.
Best Regards,
eduardo.
On 7 jul, 11:19, Stefan Schulte <stefan.schu...@taunusstein.net>
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 12:20:40PM -0500, Tim Mooney wrote:
> > > How to ensure groups dependencies at user creation ?.
>
> > If you were just talking about the user's default group, then it would
> > be one of the few cases where puppet establishes an ordering relation
> > for you automatically. In other words:
>
> > user { 'foo':
> > gid => 'bar',
> > }
>
> > automatically ensures that group 'bar' is present before user 'foo'.
>
> > I don't know if that same thing is true for supplemental groups
>
> It is also true for supplemental groups. You can see puppet creates the
> relationship when you run puppet agent / puppet apply in debug mode.
>
> So when I run
>
> # puppet apply -vd --noop << EOF
> group { ['foo', 'bar']:ensure => present }
> user { 'bob': groups => [ 'foo', 'bar' ], ensure => present }
> EOF
>
> I get
>
> debug: /Stage[main]//User[bob]: Autorequiring Group[bar]
> debug: /Stage[main]//User[bob]: Autorequiring Group[foo]
>
> -Stefan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
