I admire your conviction but keep in mind that Red Hat and others have done a similar thing and it's only been good for the community. Perhaps you don't use RHEL, but you certainly use one of the many innovations that were funded by dollars that came from RHEL subscriptions.
I also think you're being overly dramatic and exaggerating when you say that it's "treated like a red headed step-child". We disagree but I think what's changed is pretty minor in the big scheme of things. Jeffrey. On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:39 PM, windowsrefund <windowsref...@gmail.com>wrote: > This has nothing to do with being adept and also has nothing to do with > PL's business model. For a Free Software zealot such as myself, the > software and it's community is far more important. It was bad enough to see > the business agenda decide to switch to a non-copyleft license and now > we're seeing the free software version treated like a red headed > step-child. We've seen this trend play itself out hundreds of times over > the years and it's starting to look like PL is turning out to be a wolf in > sheep's clothing. We'll see... > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
