On 12/17/2012 03:44 PM, jcbollinger wrote: > * Because the run stage in which a class should be applied isn't a > characteristic of the class itself, but rather of how it is used
Yeah, that makes sense. > Aha! My own biggest objection to run stages, straight out of someone > else's mouth! Honestly, I'm not all that enthusiastic about run stages > generally -- I prefer ordinary resource relationships -- but stages do > have their uses if you can get past the parametrized-style declaration > thing. My biggest concern is to set up repositories before main. Everything else uses ordinary relations and works ok. > It should be safe to include foo_wrapper multiple times, as long as none > of the declarations (except possibly the first one parsed) use > parametrized class syntax, and as long as nothing else declares class > 'foo' directly. Yeah, I've already done the re-factoring of my code and everything works like a charm with wrapper classes. > You may also find that you can declare ordinary relationships with Stage > resources (I don't actually know, so if you test it then let us know). > Even If so, that might or might not actually help. I don't frankly need it, because I make relationships to wrapper classes... But I can test it if you want. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
