On 10 May 2013 19:52, Ramin K <ramin-l...@badapple.net> wrote: > > In any case I'd like to see more discussion on highly available > Puppet regardless of way it's implemented.
We are using SRV records for running multiple puppetmasters and selecting a site local but allowing fallback to others in case it is down. We have 6 puppetmasters for the production environment running in this way currently. Each normally handling 500-1000 nodes. The git repository is push replicated to each one of them. But only one is CA, it is backed up. If it would crash we are fine with having a outage on installing new nodes until we have restored that part to another node. But we have looked into some solutions for maybe making it more resilient though. For PuppetDB we have two service nodes and a master and hot standby for the postgres database. -- Erik Dalén -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
