On 20.06.2013 00:34, Alessandro Franceschi wrote:
Having a curated repository of interoperable modules without a minimum set of shared parameters would be a great drawback and a major lost occasion.
Yes.
_A really reusable module HAS to be parametrized_.
Yes.
Somehow it also seems that some other people are doing the same with them, given some figures from GitHub and the fact that about 100 different committers have improved or patched them.
Yes.
One of the reasons why I'm basically considering to thrash all this "legacy" work and trying to promote and embrace wider standards is that I definitively think that they can give great benefits to Puppet's modules ecosystem.
Yes.
Still this idea is not only mine, I've talked and shared it with various other Puppetteers (some of them started to make modules even before me or you even knew what Puppet was) and the consensus is wide enough to make me think that even without an explicit support from PuppetLabs, a robust, coherent, shared and single repository of Puppet modules made by (some) community members can be done and can work well.
Yes. Regards, David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
