This isn't about two masters, but two agents. The reason being is permissions.. sudo, ldap, nfs, ntp, etc is managed by a separate group. Everything else is up to us. We do not have access to that master and they are using 2.7, while we would like to use the 3.x version. It's not the best situation. Because our modules are written in 3.x syntax, we cannot share modules because we use the newer features in 3.x vs 2.7.
The installation/run works fine and coexist with absolute path, as recommended by R.I, just not with the renamed short command. I'm just curious about the shortcut, because normally I would symlink to the binary and it would be fine, but in this scenario when I symlink it ends up using the command as an ARGV 0 value. -John. On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 5:26:56 PM UTC-7, Pete wrote: > > I think the general consensus on multiple masters managing a node is > "don't do it". > > I personally can't see a reason why this sort of thing is even necessary. > > Why do you need two separate masters managing the same node? > > What specific reason do you need to split the resource management > between two masters? > > Can't you achieve the same effect with modules? > > > On 10 July 2013 03:33, John V. <jvil...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote: > > I'm trying to do the same thing and running into two minor problems.. I > > would like to rename the puppet command > > to something like puppet3. We're running two versions for two separate > teams > > for 2.7 and 3.x However, when I try to do a symlink I get the following > > error. > > > > Error: Unknown Puppet subcommand 'puppet3' > > See 'puppet help' for help on available puppet subcommands > > > > ie > > puppet agent -t -> everything is normal > > > > puppet3 agent -t -> calls puppet3 /opt/puppet3.2/bin/puppet > > > > Error: Unknown Puppet subcommand 'puppet3' > > See 'puppet help' for help on available puppet subcommands > > > > > > I do not have any problems with puppet colliding with puppet 2 but I'd > like > > to use a shortcut vs using the /path/to/puppet3/bin/.puppet. > > > > Is there a way to do this? > > > > Thank you. > > > > -John > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "Puppet Users" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > > email to puppet-users...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > > To post to this group, send email to > > puppet...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>. > > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
