This is something I've been concerned about -- and how to properly approach this.
For example, we can use Puppet to ensure that the directories (mount points) exist and that the entries are present in /etc/fstab -- but I grow very concerned about automating the NFS-mount part of this. I don't think we'd want to use autofs, as the namespace isn't visible unless you "cd" directly into it. We nixed this idea with /home, for example. What would be the safest ideal way to approach this? Thanks! On Sunday, August 25, 2013 2:57:24 AM UTC-4, jcbollinger wrote: > > > On Sunday, August 25, 2013 1:54:09 AM UTC-5, jcbollinger wrote: >> >> Therefore, unless you do something to ensure your FS unmounted before the >> File is applied, the File will sometimes manage the local directory, but >> other times manage the remote one. That may be tolerable, [...] >> > > I should clarify: it probably is NOT tolerable to unmount and remount the > FS during every Puppet run, but it might be tolerable to have Puppet manage > the remote filesystem root when that is already mounted. > > > John > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
