On 4/21/20 3:33 AM, Bram Vogelaar wrote:
I too find it excruciating to use, I have described it in the past as having a rage inducing cli, and the lack of documentation makes it hard to use. Which has driven me to use test-kitchen for doing puppet acceptance testing. (with the added benefit of being able to use inspec profiles). In my world view the uptake has been very small outside the vox pupuli and puppet supported modules because of this. After Litmus was released i have never considered Beaker again for any real testing needs, since test-kitchen is very very single node only by design.
My experience was similar. I tried to figure out beaker but was unable to make progress due to the lack of documentation and examples (almost two years ago now). With test-kitchen and kitchen-puppet I was able to do my testing and it is my preferred runtime testing framework. I also found the integration with InSpec very useful.
-- Konrad Scherer, MTS, Linux Products Group, Wind River -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/e3571a4a-036c-5cea-7ae7-c92e8c3d08eb%40windriver.com.
