--- On Fri, 6/24/11, gusano <elgusanor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: gusano <elgusanor...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [puredyne] Puredata vs. Pd-extended > To: puredyne@goto10.org > Date: Friday, June 24, 2011, 8:35 PM > On 06/24/2011 08:25 PM, Tyler Leavitt > wrote: > > @J bz - No, I was not able to install from the > installer, though I had > > issues installing Debian 6 via usb/unetbootin also so > I'm curious if it > > was my hardware. > > > > So who packages pd for pure:dyne then? I'd be curious > to know the > > reasons for not using pd-extended instead of pd... > > maybe because pure:dyne is supposed to stay light sizewise > (as a Live distro that should fit a CD/USB) and pd-extended > is huuge (and a bit bloated IMHO) ?? That's changing with 0.43. As I understand it pd-extended should be nearly identical to pd-vanilla (the exception being [initbang] and [closebang] in extended), and all the libs will be available as separate packages. (Maybe there will still be a giant pd-ext package as well for people who want it.) > > consider also that pure:dyne devs are smart and put the > most usefull pd-libs already available in a neat > pd-vanilla. > > but that's just a guess ;) > > cheers, > _y > --- > Puredyne@goto10.org > http://identi.ca/group/puredyne > irc://irc.goto10.org/puredyne > --- Puredyne@goto10.org http://identi.ca/group/puredyne irc://irc.goto10.org/puredyne
