<> Have a look at red hats tuned which is much better and open source at fedora. >> >>https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/tuned.git >> >>But I have not found reasonable docs - why is is better? What features does i>>t provide? Can it replace ksmtuned?
tuned tool from redhat is just for tunning kernel params, cpu gouvernor, ioscheduler, ... from profiles (high-bandwith vs low latency for example) It's not related to ksm. you can find details about the profils and tuning values here : https://videos.cdn.redhat.com/summit2015/presentations/11952_performance-tuning-red-hat-enterprise-linux-platform-for-databases.pdf (page 8). Could be great to have something similar in proxmox. (should be east to implement), choosing in gui for each server, presets of tuning. BTW, I have redone a lot of tests with transparent hugepage and last kernels, it seem to works fine with default MADVISE. I have done tests with a lot of databases, redis, mongo and I don't have seen any regression, and some boost with java application ----- Mail original ----- De: "dietmar" <diet...@proxmox.com> À: "Stefan Priebe" <s.pri...@profihost.ag>, "pve-devel" <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com> Envoyé: Samedi 20 Février 2016 09:16:09 Objet: Re: [pve-devel] pve-kernel package : add irqbalance as recommended ? (like debian linux-image package) > Sadly there is various Hardware and chips out there crashing with irqbalance. > That's why I removed it from all machines and tune where needed. OK, so we cannot recommend it... > Have a look at red hats tuned which is much better and open source at fedora. https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/tuned.git But I have not found reasonable docs - why is is better? What features does it provide? Can it replace ksmtuned? _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel