> Am 20.02.2016 um 08:25 schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER <aderum...@odiso.com>: > >>> Some articles, for instance >>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/ols/2009/ols2009-pages-169-184.pdf, >>> explicitly recommend disabling irqbalance when 10GbE is involved. >>> >>> Do you know if this is still true today? After all, the paper is from 2009. > > Well, the article is about to disabling irqbalance AND manually binding cpus > on network interfaces. > > Manual binding is better because you can fine tuning. > > But using irqbalance vs do nothing, irqbalance wins. > > I have seen a lot of system, using only cpu0 for network interrupts for > example.
Ah, I see. In that case it would make sense indeed. The cards I use (both nic and sas/raid) employ one interrupt queue per core, so there never was anything for me to tune. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
