>>And what about CIFS? I can't comment about CIFS, I never run vm on it.
But what I known , is that it's really depending of CIFS version implementation, both client && server. Old CIFS version (smb 1.x) (windows2003/xp), was a very bad protocol (very chatty). I known that last windows2012 have very good CIFS (smb 3.x), I don't known support in samba4 server or other NAS. http://ram.kossboss.com/correlating-versions-samba-smbcifs/ To be honest,I don't care anymore, as I'm currently migrating on my vms on ceph/rbd ;) ----- Mail original ----- De: "dietmar" <diet...@proxmox.com> À: "aderumier" <aderum...@odiso.com>, "pve-devel" <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com> Envoyé: Mercredi 12 Octobre 2016 06:32:37 Objet: Re: [pve-devel] LXC volumes on ZFS over iSCSI > >>NFS does not provide good iops and has the ability to bring down a > >>node. IMHO NFS is only useful as filestorage server for backups and > >>iso images. > > Well, this is very dependent of nfs server implementation quality. > I'm running vm on netapp san though nfs 4.1, and I have very good > performance. > > I think the biggest problem is lack of fstrim/discard. (should be availble in > the future nfs 4.2) And what about CIFS? _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
