If I may add another question: how are you planning to handle those dynamic
interface names that was introduced a few
years ago? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consistent_Network_Device_Naming
Regards,
Uwe
Am 20.02.2017 um 20:58 schrieb Sten Aus:
> Hi! Thanks for fast response!
>
> Can it be overwritten somehow or should I stick to only eth* devices? Or do
> you accept some prefixes as well?
>
> Is it Proxmox "functionality" or OVS'?
>
> Sten
>
>
> On 20.02.17 17:54, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>>> GUI says that "g10" is not a OVSPort. If I type in "eth2" - it magically
>>> works.
>> We use the device name to find out the device type. g10 does not look
>> like an ethernet device, so this does not work.
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
