with 2 rooms there is no way to avoid a split brain situation unless you have a tie breaker outside one of those 2 rooms.

Run a Mon on a neutral third location is the quick, correct, and simple solution.

Or

you need to have a master-slave situation where one room is the master (3 mons) and the other room is the slave (2 mons) and the slave can not operate without the master, but the master can operate alone.

good luck
Ronny


On 14.09.2019 16:11, f.cu...@panservice.it wrote:
This is My last choice :)
Inviato dal mio dispositivo Huawei
-------- Messaggio originale --------
Oggetto: Re: [PVE-User] Ceph MON quorum problem
Da: "Brian :"
A: Fabrizio Cuseo ,PVE User List
CC:


Have a mon that runs somewhere that isn't either of those rooms.

On Friday, September 13, 2019, Fabrizio Cuseo <f.cu...@panservice.it> wrote:
Hello.
I am planning a 6 hosts cluster.

3 hosts are located in the CedA room
3 hosts are located in the CedB room

the two rooms are connected with a 2 x 10Gbit fiber (200mt) and in each
room i have 2 x 10Gbit stacked switch and each host have a 2 x 10Gbit (one
for each switch) for Ceph storage.

My need is to have a full redundancy cluster that can survive to CedA (or
CedB) disaster.

I have modified the crush map, so I have a RBD Pool that writes 2 copies
in CedA hosts, and 2 copies in CedB hosts, so a very good redundancy (disk
space is not a problem).

But if I loose one of the rooms, i can't establish the needed quorum.

Some suggestion to have a quick and not too complicated way to satisfy my
need ?

Regards, Fabrizio


_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user


_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Reply via email to