Becky Ligon <[email protected]> writes: > Dave: > > At Clemson, we have been using IPoIB for a few years without any problems, > but I don't have any performance comparisons. > > The OFS development team has "fixed" the initial problems that we saw with > IB and distributed directories and are now going through some more > testing. When we are confident that IB will work, we will create another > release, and ensure the release notes indicate this. In the 2.9.2 release > notes, there is an entry indicating that IB is in development.
Thanks, but it wasn't clear to me that meant that IB support doesn't work, rather than it had some developments. Could you say in what way it's broken, and when it last worked (assuming it did, as pvfs.org suggests)? I've run through the IMB-IO with it, apparently successfully, but haven't had a chance to compare with IPoIB and run something more realistic. _______________________________________________ Pvfs2-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-users
