Norman Rasmussen writes:
- Could you post some of the auth's for pymsnt/pyicqt/jcr with shorted
- passwords - i.e. they should all work. I'd like to double check that
- my understanding of the JEP is right.
Done..
http://www.cirr.com/~eric/muc-jcr-connect.1.txt
http://www.cirr.com/~eric/pymsn-connect.1.txt
http://www.cirr.com/~eric/pyicq-connect.1.txt
- FYI: Check out tcpflow if you can :-)
I will soon.. (another thing on the to check list.. :)
- I'd be tempted to say, rip out the sha1 hash calculations from
- jabberd2/jcr and test them separately from the whole jabber
- environment. i.e. with constant inputs, etc.
I've been looking at the source for the sha1 functions
provided as part of jabber2, and it's kinda scary, all the
assumptions I can see littered throughout the code about word
size.. Ugh!
And the JCR library used by muc uses the same source
module (exactly, right down to the comments.)
- If you add some debugging output then you could compare between i32
- and a64 easily. (If you don't have/can't find a i32 machine, I'm
- happy to run the code)
At this point, given that jabberd2 uses OpenSSL for
other things, I'm wondering why it isn't using OpenSSL to get a
platform independent (correct?) sha1 implementation.
I'm copying onto the jabberd dev list to make them aware
of the problem.
Thanks,
Eric
--
Eric Schnoebelen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cirr.com
You have to walk carefully in the beginning of love; the running
across fields into your lover's arms can only come later when
you're sure they won't laugh if you trip. -- Jonathan Carroll
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 30 05:16:35 2005
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alexey Nezhdanov)
Date: Fri Dec 30 05:16:50 2005
Subject: [py-transports] Yahoo Python Transport???
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Friday 30, Dec 2005 01:15 Norman Rasmussen wrote:
> yes. check out the latest CVS sources of the xmpppy project
> (xmpppy.sf.net). (there's no release unfortunately, CVS is the only
> place the transport exists in a working condition)
Really? I was pretty sure that I have made a 1.0 release by the Mike's
request. But CVS is better way to go IMHO.
--
Respectfully
Alexey Nezhdanov
