Hi, On May 29, 2007, at 8:20 AM, Norman Rasmussen wrote:
> On 5/28/07, Fidelio Fidelio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I am running a cluster of ejabberd nodes and am testing how to >> also cluster >> the transports. As a user session is only valid within one >> instance of the >> transport (compjid), it seems there should be a front end to all the >> transports that assures that all messages from one jid go always >> to the same >> instance (compjid) of the transport. It seems that ejabberd does >> not handle >> the compjid, but this part I will have to discuss in the ejabberd >> list. >> Additionally, that front end could do the load balancing. >> I am pretty sure not to be the first person to have that problem, >> so I was >> looking for someone who could indicate me how they do it. > > compjid only supports jabber.com's XCP clustering at the moment. > Clustering with ejabberd is untested. We are using it with 9 MSN instances. There where some problems at first, but it works very well now. Best regards, -- HIId: Pedro Melo SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ py-transports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports
