Thanks for the update on how this went! Sorry it was unwieldy, but let's see how the self-cached version does.
On Wednesday, May 4, 2016 at 1:57:08 AM UTC-4, Benjamin Moran wrote: > > Well, with no limit on rotation precision, the cache quickly grows to 10s > of MiB, so that's a no-go. Also, after some thought, I think that limiting > the rotation precision is probably a bad way to address this. For that > reason the memoizing approach is scrapped for now. > > I'm considering doing a small pull request with just the self-cached cr > and sr values, since that gives a nice improvement with no drawbacks. I'll > post my separate rewritten float & int set_position methods later for > feedback. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
