I have not taken a detailed look into how much work would be required to
implement this idea. Also, uni started this week so I will not have quite
as much time as I have had over the holidays. If anyone wants to test out
this idea, it would be great.
It seems like a big job adding that kind of stuff to pygtk. Also,
currently people can use the lower level _gtk module to write GTK programs
(and I know some people do use it -- they see it as a good way of
prototyping interfaces that can then be translated to C very quickly). I
wouldn't want this ability to be lost in any changes.
James Henstridge.
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/
On 23 Feb 1999, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> > > Sorry for the length. James, if you think this won't work, I'd like
> > > to see what I'm missing.
> >
> > I have a feeling it's not so much a matter of whether it will work
> > or not, but the amount of work involved.
>
> That's not the feeling I got from James' earlier messages, but you may
> well be right. James, if you think the scheme would function but are
> daunted by the amount of work, I'm also willing to help.
> To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
