James> You have taken my response out of context :) The question was
James> whether pygtk worked with python 2.1, and I was saying that the C
James> API (of python) has not changed incompatibly for a long time.
Thanks for the clarification. It hadn't occurred to me that the second 1.4
referred to Python 1.4. That's pretty damn ancient in Internet years... ;-)
James> BTW, gtk+ HEAD (what will be gtk+ 2.0) is already very good.
How soon before we get a peek at PyGTK for gtk+ 2.0?
Skip
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
