On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 15:00, John Hunter wrote: > > Cedric> As a side note, I'm getting tired of these various, > Cedric> unofficial and incompatible (registry-wise) installers, > Cedric> and the installation questions/problems they generate. I > Cedric> don't think it helps in spreading the use of GTK+ on > Cedric> win32. > > > Which ones? Do you count the dropline in this batch? Is there an > "official" installer? I have installed dropline + pygtk on at least > 30 windows computers including 98, 2000, NT, ME and XP, and the only > problems I have ever had are occasionally dealing with some lingering > dlls that previous installs of glade etc left in the system path.
Development has ceased for the dropline installer, as of gtk+-2.2.4. This means that we will have to use another installer for pygtk/gtk+-2.4. Currently, I recommend the one provided by the gladewin32 project (http://gladewin32.sourceforge.net) for pygtk-2.3.x (and gtkmm-2.4 !!!), but this means checking for different registry entries and installation paths. I think Tor Lillqvist does not want to tag an installer as "official", following the rules of the gnome project (no official binaries. Only the source tarballs are official). Cedric _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
