On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 19:02 +0200, Rafael Villar Burke wrote: > Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote: > > > We have currently two alternative solutions in mind, to workaround > >this issue: > > > > 1. Map GObject property names to python attributes with a predefined > >prefix reserved for properties. Examples: label.prop_text, > >label.proptext, etc.. (others?) > > > > 2. Create a properties container object. Examples label.prop.text, > >label.props.text, label.properties.text, (others?) > > > > > [...] > > > So, let's hear some opinions from PyGTK users. Starting with > >myself ;-) I have a slight preference for label.prop.text. > > > > > I like the second one most, and preferably the long one > label.properties.text. It needs some more typing, but with the nice IDEs > we will be using autocompletion will work as a charm, and having the > more readable full word is better than the short one. Furthermore, as > python makes you type less, you can afford make the names in your > program clearer, or we'll end un using hungarian notation ;) > I like label.props.text most. properties and props are pretty much interchangable and since I still type things in by hand I prefer the shorter form. label.prop.text would also make sense although list_of_properties = dir(label.prop) which someone else thought would be a nice feature isn't as intuitively named.
-Toshio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list pygtk@daa.com.au http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
