On 6 May 2011 21:07, Jason Heeris <jason.hee...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have an object that refers to a numpy array of several hundred data > points, and a few fit parameters and flags. I append the fit > parameters to the ListStore, and map the object to the path of the new > row so I can get back the data points, for use upon row activation (or > cell toggle). > > While we've been discussing this, I've been poring over the pygtk docs > some more and think I see what I should be doing: I could store the > object itself in the ListStore as well, and simply not add a > TreeViewColumn for it in the TreeView. Then I can access it directly > upon row activation, etc. Does this sound reasonable, or is there a > better way?
Storing the object in a hidden column is fine, and what I assumed you were doing originally. -- Neil Muller drnlmul...@gmail.com I've got a gmail account. Why haven't I become cool? _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list pygtk@daa.com.au http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://faq.pygtk.org/
