> +1 for moving onwards to Python 3. +1 here too.
>> >> Cons: with Six we need to drop support for python 2.2 and 2.3. > > +1. Python 2.4 was released in 2004, this is seven years ago. AFAIK all > major Linux distros are at 2.5 at least. > > Further: PyInstaller is meant for packaging self contained packages, which > is (almost) independent of the system it should be run on. So only the > development environments count. If somebody used e.g. Python 2.2 and > successfully packages his/her program, her/she can simply stay with the > current version of PyInstaller. Exactly my view, too. I think the continued lack of library support for Python 3 in general is really bad for the language. I've already started hearing comparisons between Python 3 and Perl 6 (which is really not a nice thing). To develop self-contained apps using PyInstaller, I've had to go *back* to Python 2.7. It's not so bad, but it would be much nicer to use of all the features of Python 3. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyInstaller" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyinstaller?hl=en.
