On 1/7/08, Mike Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Over the weekend Ben and I and others developed a plan to overhaul > WebHelpers. A preliminary API proposal is here: > http://wiki.pylonshq.com/display/pylonsprojects/WebHelpers+ideas . > The main goals are:
Sounds nice. > > The old functions will be available but deprecated in Pylons 0.9.7 > (spring 2008), and eliminated in Pylons 1.0 (summer/fall). The API is > not fixed yet and there's no reference implementation, so you'll have > to continue using the existing WebHelpers functions for now. > > Feedback questions: > > * Which parts of WebHelpers do you use besides url_for and the form tags? I use url_for plus form tags. That's all. Only now, reading your feedback questions I realied webhelpers contained a lot more. ;) 'url_for' will likely be changing to a smarter 'url' object, and moved > out of WebHelpers. More info soon. changing names, again? Pls don't do that. It's so much easier to grep for url_for symbol when, say, you need to update your routing rules. "url" is much worse. +1 for moving it into Pylons core. As for the rest of cruft, TG2 seems like a natural place for it, since it is "batteries included" framework, as opposed to "minimalistic Pylons". No? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
