Thanks for the pointer. It *is* a very nice site - I had no idea it is implemented pylons.
On Jul 16, 1:15 am, Dalius Dobravolskas <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > DavidG wrote: > > 1. ease/speed of programming > > I think WSGI-nature of Pylons makes it very good balanced choice between > Django and Zope. Easy to learn as Django and easy to extend as Zope.> 2. ease > of testing > > Nothing different than in other Python web frameworks.> 3. scalability > > I have not developed anything that big yet. I believe it scales well. As > far as I know about sites running Pylons the biggest one might > behttp://widgets.opera.com/and that site has a lot of > users.http://files.myopera.com/Sharebear/EuroPython08/SpringIntoPylons/inde...> > 4. reliability > > You can reach desired level or reliability by combining pip, virtualenv > and wsgi components.> 5. maintainability > > That's more about how you work not about frameworks.> 6. flexibility > > If you don't like one WSGI component you can write your own. Most > probably you will not need to do that but I did that once (because of > OpenID).> 7. availability of good libraries > > I believe there is no problem here. > > Regards, > Dalius --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
