On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 16:08 -0400, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 06:23:50PM -0700, Ben Bangert wrote: > > Hmm, yes, that is true. What do you think would be the best way? Blog > > posts? I'm just unsure of what to say, should I just put a new post up > > now and then saying, "We're not dead, really!" ? > > I have the benefit of seeing and using many free software projects > over the years, so my perspective may be slanted. The number one > indicator I use is community activity. > > The fact that pylons has a mailing list with people discussing > technical items and adminstrative details screams out loud about the > activity of the project!
I agree with the above, but it's worth bearing in mind that a new evaluators first stop is always going to be the website, so impressions given by the website are the most powerful. Mostly it is only those for whom the website "passes" will go on to check out the mailing list archives. iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---