On May 25, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > Are you interesting in folks using Pylons only in internal-facing > applications? We have a number of critical pieces of internal > services running on Pylons, but none of it will ever be user-visible. > > If so, I'll talk to my boss and the marketing folks to clear it.
Yep, internal is fine. It's a "Who is using Pylons" rather than a "Sites running Pylons". I heard a few people at the companies are nervous that appearing on the front page under "Who's Using Pylons" might be interpreted as an endorsement and open them up to liability, so I'm having a lawyer craft a proper legal disclaimer that "use of Pylons does not constitute an official endorsement by these companies" etc. Ah, the joys of the legal world... Cheers, Ben -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-disc...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
