Start a hearsay page. I heard the State of Oregon is using Pylons and loving it, but you didn't hear that from me ;-)
On May 25, 9:12 am, Ben Bangert <[email protected]> wrote: > On May 25, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > > > Are you interesting in folks using Pylons only in internal-facing > > applications? We have a number of critical pieces of internal > > services running on Pylons, but none of it will ever be user-visible. > > > If so, I'll talk to my boss and the marketing folks to clear it. > > Yep, internal is fine. It's a "Who is using Pylons" rather than a "Sites > running Pylons". I heard a few people at the companies are nervous that > appearing on the front page under "Who's Using Pylons" might be interpreted > as an endorsement and open them up to liability, so I'm having a lawyer craft > a proper legal disclaimer that "use of Pylons does not constitute an official > endorsement by these companies" etc. Ah, the joys of the legal world... > > Cheers, > Ben > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pylons-discuss" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
