On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 20:30 +0100, Vlad K. wrote: > For worse I'd say because using SQLAlchemy directly works just fine and > as expected, without the need to reload the data after failed session.
By the way, are you sure about this? I've heard that when you commit or abort a "raw" SQLA session, the outcome is the same. Objects loaded from a finished SQLA session become invalidated without the "expire_on_commit=False" (not the default) argument to the sessionmaker. Am I wrong about that? - C -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
