I want to add schema-driven, autogenerated forms with validation to my prototyped pyramid application using ZODB for persistence. I already have experience with deform<=1.999, since I worked quite a bit with it while working with ToDoPyramid tutorial <https://github.com/saschagottfried/todopyramid> created by SixFeetUp.
I know that kotti & substance-d use deform extensively. I really like the demo site for deform2.0a2 <http://deform2demo.repoze.org/> But deform2 did not change much from alpha since 18 months. <https://pypi.python.org/pypi/deform> Maybe I missed something. I do not want add libraries to my application that lost developer support/attention. I do not want to spend much (or even any) time to make deform2.X work with a more recent Twitter Bootstrap (>=3.2). I found leaner forms libraries like formvalidation.io that appeal to me as well, but I would prefer testing my models/schema/validation in python. I really like the schema-driven approach of deform and similar pyramid/python libraries. What is the current state of deform with respect to developer acceptance and future developer support? Would you still recommend adding deform/colander to a more recent pyramid application? The quick tutorial for adding forms <http://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/pyramid/en/master/quick_tutorial/forms.html#forms-and-validation-with-deform> is still telling this story? What is your opinion? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
