>
> So the bottom line is: deform and colander are actively used and so 
> stable that no changes were required recently. 
>

I am glad to know this. But usually developers mark such libraries as 
stable, why this is not happening? Can you think of any reasons?


Am Montag, 11. Mai 2015 10:55:11 UTC+2 schrieb Andreas Kaiser:
>
> On 11 May 2015, at 10:08, Sascha Gottfried wrote: 
>
> > I know that kotti & substance-d use deform extensively. 
> > I really like the demo site for deform2.0a2 
> > <http://deform2demo.repoze.org/> 
> > 
> > But deform2 did not change much from alpha since 18 months. 
> > <https://pypi.python.org/pypi/deform> Maybe I missed something. 
> > I do not want add libraries to my application that lost developer 
> > support/attention. 
> > I do not want to spend much (or even any) time to make deform2.X work 
> > with 
> > a more recent Twitter Bootstrap (>=3.2). 
> > I found leaner forms libraries like formvalidation.io that appeal to 
> > me as 
> > well, but I would prefer testing my models/schema/validation in 
> > python. 
> > I really like the schema-driven approach of deform and similar 
> > pyramid/python libraries. 
> > 
> > What is the current state of deform with respect to developer 
> > acceptance 
> > and future developer support? 
> > Would you still recommend adding deform/colander to a more recent 
> > pyramid 
> > application? 
> > The quick tutorial for adding forms 
> > <
> http://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/pyramid/en/master/quick_tutorial/forms.html#forms-and-validation-with-deform>
>  
>
> > is still telling this story? 
> > 
> > What is your opinion? 
>
> Kotti always uses the latest versions of all upstream packages, for that 
> matter: Bootstrap 3.3.4, deform 2.0a2 and colander 1.0. This combination 
> performs flawlessly out of the box for all the widgets Kotti uses. We 
> only have a customized RichTextWidget to allow file / image browsing and 
> uploading. 
>
> As Kotti indeed heavily relies upon deform and Bootstrap and is actively 
> maintained, we will most probably make pull requests for deform if/when 
> something changes in upcoming versions of Bootstrap that would require 
> respective changes in deform. 
>
> So the bottom line is: deform and colander are actively used and so 
> stable that no changes were required recently. 
>
>
> HTH, 
>
> Andreas 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to