Hi Anto, On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Antonio Cuni <anto.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, we have a speedup of ~2-2.5x which is more or less what you would expect > by "just" removing the interpretation overhead. It probably indicates that we > have laaaarge room for improvements, but I suppose that we already knew that > :-)
No, I would argue that it's already 2x better than "just" removing the interpretation overhead, because PyPy-no-jit is up to 2x slower than CPython to start with :-) Armin _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev